Match Performance
Your Performance
51.89% of winner
Place:5 / 8
Match %:51.89%
Match Pts:301.51
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:50.55%
Std Dev:10.2
Spread:33.7 pts
Hits:87A 23C 6D 3M
Best:
77.11% (S3)
Worst:
43.37% (S4)
Division Winner
Piotr Tomaka
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:581.04
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:97.69%
Std Dev:4.6
Spread:13.9 pts
Hits:86A 28C 5D
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
86.11% (S5)
40%
70%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 2.4× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
50.55%
6 stages · 43.37% – 77.11%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
55.98%
4 stages · 47.44% – 77.11%
Long(25+ shots)
44.04%
2 stages · 43.37% – 44.65%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 4 | 44.65% | 3.6705 | 35.69 | 23A 5C 1D | +120.58% | -1.50% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 6 | 47.44% | 2.6843 | 30.92 | 16A 4C 1D 1M | +78.52% | -15.31% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 2 | 77.11% | 5.4560 | 12.83 | 14A | +51.30% | +16.67% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 6 | 43.37% | 2.7190 | 29.79 | 13A 8C 2D 1M | +90.60% | -17.35% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 6 | 53.24% | 4.2502 | 12.47 | 10A 4C 1D 1M | +34.52% | -28.38% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 7 | 51.39% | 3.9043 | 15.88 | 11A 2C 1D | +77.43% | -8.82% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.