Match Performance
Your Performance
36.28% of winner
Place:8 / 8
Match %:36.28%
Match Pts:210.78
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:35.64%
Std Dev:10.2
Spread:27.3 pts
Hits:48A 58C 10D 3M 1NS
Best:
48.10% (S4)
Worst:
20.82% (S6)
Division Winner
Piotr Tomaka
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:581.04
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:97.69%
Std Dev:4.6
Spread:13.9 pts
Hits:86A 28C 5D
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
86.11% (S5)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 2.0× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
35.64%
6 stages · 20.82% – 48.10%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
30.39%
4 stages · 20.82% – 42.95%
Long(25+ shots)
41.93%
2 stages · 36.40% – 48.10%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 8 | 36.40% | 2.9922 | 39.77 | 17A 11C 1D | +145.80% | -10.53% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 8 | 21.55% | 1.2195 | 31.16 | 6A 12C 2D 2M 1NS | +79.91% | -61.22% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 7 | 39.49% | 2.7938 | 20.76 | 10A 2C 2D | +144.81% | -3.33% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 5 | 48.10% | 3.0158 | 27.19 | 8A 13C 3D | +73.96% | -16.33% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 8 | 42.95% | 3.4286 | 17.50 | 6A 10C | +88.78% | -18.92% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 8 | 20.82% | 1.5817 | 17.07 | 1A 10C 2D 1M | +90.73% | -60.29% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.