Match Performance
Your Performance
31.37% of winner
Place:9 / 11
Match %:31.37%
Match Pts:720.27
Consistency:Moderate
Avg:62.09%
Std Dev:13.3
Spread:41.5 pts
Hits:178A 46C 5D 3M
Best:
88.09% (S17)
Worst:
46.57% (S14)
Division Winner
Szymon Mikeska
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2296.31
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:99.41%
Std Dev:1.8
Spread:7.0 pts
Hits:369A 83C 7D 3M
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
92.98% (S24)
40%
70%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 5.9× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
58.90%
10 stages · 46.57% – 88.09%
Low HF(Technical)
79.48%
2 stages · 76.80% – 80.82%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
66.97%
6 stages · 46.57% – 88.09%
Medium(13-24 shots)
61.21%
4 stages · 48.12% – 80.82%
Long(25+ shots)
57.93%
2 stages · 47.00% – 68.86%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 | - | - | - | - | 2A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 2 Stage 2 | - | - | - | - | 2A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 3 Stage 3 | - | - | - | - | 4A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 4 Stage 4 | - | - | - | - | 2A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 5 Stage 5 | - | - | - | - | 6A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 6 Stage 6 | - | - | - | - | 4A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 7 Stage 7 | - | - | - | - | 4A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 8 Stage 8 | - | - | - | - | 4A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 9 Stage 9 | - | - | - | - | 2A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 10 Stage 10 | - | - | - | - | 4A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 11 Stage 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 12 Stage 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 13 Stage 13 Med | 4 | 78.89% | 4.8430 | 11.15 | 10A 1C 1D | +31.64% | +3.85% | - | ||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Med | 7 | 46.57% | 2.5369 | 16.95 | 10A 1C 1M | +64.88% | -23.21% | - | ||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 6 | 57.71% | 3.8141 | 28.84 | 19A 5C | +76.50% | +1.85% | - | ||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Low | 4 | 80.82% | 3.9784 | 29.66 | 23A 1C | +43.15% | +15.69% | - | ||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Med | 4 | 88.09% | 5.4990 | 9.82 | 9A 3C | +17.89% | +3.85% | - | ||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 5 | 68.86% | 5.9605 | 24.83 | 26A 6C | +39.57% | -3.90% | - | ||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Med | 4 | 60.64% | 4.1667 | 12.48 | 8A 4C | +53.13% | -7.14% | - | ||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 3 | 58.21% | 4.4717 | 20.35 | 17A 5C 1D 1M | +39.57% | -18.75% | - | ||
Stage 21 Stage 21 Med | 5 | 50.80% | 3.6603 | 13.66 | 8A 3C 1D | +69.69% | -13.79% | - | ||
Stage 22 Stage 22 Low | 6 | 76.80% | 3.3445 | 14.95 | 8A 3C 1D | +16.25% | -10.71% | - | ||
Stage 23 Stage 23 Med | 7 | 48.12% | 2.6777 | 38.84 | 17A 6C 1D | +96.46% | -5.45% | - | ||
Stage 24 Stage 24 Med | 8 | 47.00% | 2.9172 | 44.22 | 23A 8C 1M | +88.01% | -11.64% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.