Jacek Gruszczyński

POLISH OPEN 2026 powered by CESKA ZBROJOVKA i Halinka ARMS Cup PCCClassic

Match Performance

Your Performance
43.12% of winner
Place:8 / 11
Match %:43.12%
Match Pts:990.12
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:42.86%
Std Dev:11.6
Spread:42.1 pts
Hits:331A 102C 22D 7M
Best:
65.95% (S9)
Worst:
23.90% (S24)
Division Winner
Szymon Mikeska
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2296.31
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:99.41%
Std Dev:1.8
Spread:7.0 pts
Hits:369A 83C 7D 3M
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
92.98% (S24)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 6.0× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
39.61%
15 stages · 23.90% – 61.07%
Low HF(Technical)
47.61%
9 stages · 28.95% – 65.95%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
47.21%
12 stages · 30.16% – 65.95%
Medium(13-24 shots)
45.24%
8 stages · 28.51% – 61.54%
Long(25+ shots)
34.27%
4 stages · 23.90% – 39.53%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
838.84%2.171425.7910A 2C
+166.98%
+3.70%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
846.70%2.639317.0511A 1M
+85.33%
-13.46%
-
Stage 3
Stage 3
Low
846.13%2.087247.9115A 8C 1D
+97.08%
-9.09%
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
837.56%2.251518.219A 2C 1M
+81.92%
-31.67%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Low
861.54%2.505545.5021A 3C
+79.84%
+10.68%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Low
839.53%1.751458.2419A 8C 3D 2M
+81.72%
-28.17%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Low
828.95%1.030874.7011A 10C 2D 1M
+174.23%
-20.62%
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
838.40%2.237758.9922A 7C 1D
+138.73%
-8.33%
Stage 9
Stage 9
Low
865.95%3.025217.859A 3C
+63.76%
+8.00%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Low
859.52%2.717039.7518A 6C
+87.06%
+11.34%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Low
956.51%2.667921.7411A 1C
+105.29%
+16.00%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
947.07%3.036614.496A 4C 2D
+61.18%
-24.14%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
961.07%3.749215.4711A 1C
+82.64%
+11.54%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Med
931.91%1.738526.466A 5C 1D
+157.39%
-17.86%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
928.51%1.884652.0014A 9C 1D
+218.24%
-9.26%
-
Stage 16
Stage 16
Low
847.75%2.350548.5021A 3C
+134.07%
+11.76%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Med
960.32%3.765413.818A 4C
+65.79%
0.00%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
935.52%3.075142.6024A 7C 1M
+139.46%
-14.94%
-
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
653.49%3.675515.7811A 1C
+93.62%
+3.57%
-
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
845.36%3.484627.5516A 4C 4D
+88.96%
-14.29%
-
Stage 21
Stage 21
Med
736.93%2.661018.799A 1C 2D
+133.42%
-13.79%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Low
930.16%1.313432.7410A 1C 1M
+154.59%
-23.21%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
944.14%2.456145.6020A 4C
+130.65%
+1.82%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
923.90%1.483883.5719A 8C 5D
+255.31%
-15.07%

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.