Christophe Lecompagnon

Extreme Euro Open 2025Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
54.75% of winner
Place:28 / 35
Match %:54.75%
Match Pts:1424.04
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:51.41%
Std Dev:9.1
Spread:42.7 pts
Hits:391A 135C 20D 8M 5NS
Best:
64.53% (S4)
Worst:
21.88% (S30)
Division Winner
Robert Cernigoj
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2601.13
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:93.90%
Std Dev:8.1
Spread:28.4 pts
Hits:463A 78C 8D 5M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
71.64% (S6)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 1.5× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
51.38%
28 stages · 21.88% – 64.53%
Low HF(Technical)
52.07%
2 stages · 51.49% – 52.65%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
48.86%
15 stages · 21.88% – 61.08%
Medium(13-24 shots)
54.43%
10 stages · 35.91% – 64.35%
Long(25+ shots)
50.13%
5 stages · 42.89% – 64.53%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
2458.90%4.743520.6616A 6C
+54.06%
-9.26%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
3247.84%2.607445.6419A 11C 1D 1M
+65.84%
-20.67%
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
2759.31%3.856415.0411A 1C
+68.61%
0.00%
-
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
2664.53%3.675737.0021A 10C 1D
+44.36%
-6.85%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
2858.85%3.155029.1616A 4C
+69.93%
0.00%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Low
3052.65%2.593218.516A 6C
+62.80%
-14.29%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Med
2656.24%3.377914.217A 4C 1D
+42.24%
-20.00%
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
3435.89%2.840917.607A 5C
+132.19%
-16.67%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
2655.02%3.693614.629A 3C
+69.21%
-6.90%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
2364.35%5.326615.7712A 8C
+33.19%
-14.29%
Stage 11
Stage 11
Med
2852.58%3.947413.689A 3C
+83.38%
-3.57%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
3435.91%1.924527.5412A 4C 1D 1M 1NS
+67.72%
-39.77%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
2753.82%2.885232.5816A 4C 2D
+100.74%
+8.05%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Med
2555.01%4.160012.509A 2C 1D
+62.97%
-10.34%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
3147.70%2.928739.9520A 8C 3D 1M
+59.29%
-24.03%
-
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
3142.89%2.676348.2023A 8C 1M
+103.20%
-12.84%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Low
2751.49%2.548921.9710A 2C
+81.27%
-6.67%
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
2164.34%3.388027.4517A 2C 2D
+49.02%
-4.12%
-
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
2756.35%3.936024.3914A 8C 2D
+41.97%
-20.00%
-
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
2456.27%3.606627.4520A 3C 1NS
+70.82%
-3.88%
-
Stage 21
Stage 21
Med
3439.54%2.460615.859A 1C 1D 1M
+70.06%
-32.76%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Med
2846.29%3.508827.9315A 7C 2D
+85.70%
-14.04%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
3348.61%3.506429.6617A 6C 1D
+81.30%
-11.86%
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
2160.85%3.214316.809A 3C
+53.01%
-6.90%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
3147.32%3.849225.2019A 7C 1D 1M 1NS
+50.72%
-28.68%
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
3341.52%2.758114.149A 1C 1D 1M
+67.73%
-30.36%
-
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
3242.82%2.205326.3011A 1C
+125.75%
-3.33%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
3247.07%2.841314.439A 2C 1M
+45.17%
-31.67%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
2261.08%3.738313.918A 4C
+52.02%
-7.14%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
3521.88%1.273529.8411A 1C 2NS
+189.43%
-36.67%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.