Match Performance
Your Performance
45.78% of winner
Place:33 / 35
Match %:45.78%
Match Pts:1190.71
Consistency:Moderate
Avg:42.99%
Std Dev:12.4
Spread:49.8 pts
Hits:374A 127C 33D 20M 8NS
Best:
69.45% (S3)
Worst:
19.62% (S18)
Division Winner
Robert Cernigoj
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2601.13
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:93.90%
Std Dev:8.1
Spread:28.4 pts
Hits:463A 78C 8D 5M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
71.64% (S6)
10%
55%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 1.8× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
43.43%
28 stages · 19.62% – 69.45%
Low HF(Technical)
33.21%
2 stages · 26.81% – 39.61%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
44.79%
15 stages · 26.37% – 69.45%
Medium(13-24 shots)
39.05%
10 stages · 19.62% – 58.52%
Long(25+ shots)
46.41%
5 stages · 26.08% – 61.84%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 26 | 58.52% | 4.7131 | 19.52 | 14A 7C 1D | +45.56% | -14.81% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 27 | 57.35% | 3.1257 | 45.43 | 24A 7C 1D | +65.08% | -5.33% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 17 | 69.45% | 4.5161 | 12.40 | 10A 2C | +39.01% | -3.45% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 28 | 61.84% | 3.5228 | 37.47 | 22A 6C 4D | +46.20% | -9.59% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 34 | 39.40% | 2.1124 | 27.93 | 12A 6C 1D 1M 1NS | +62.76% | -35.87% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Low | 34 | 39.61% | 1.9509 | 15.89 | 5A 5C 1D 1M | +39.75% | -44.64% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Med | 32 | 49.32% | 2.9620 | 15.53 | 7A 3C 2D | +55.46% | -23.33% | |||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 27 | 51.06% | 4.0419 | 13.36 | 10A 1C 1D | +76.25% | -10.00% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 35 | 42.68% | 2.8649 | 14.66 | 9A 2C 1D 1NS | +69.68% | -27.59% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 34 | 48.01% | 3.9738 | 19.88 | 17A 1C 1D 1M | +67.91% | -19.39% | |||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Med | 33 | 48.27% | 3.6238 | 11.59 | 8A 4C 1NS | +55.36% | -25.00% | - | ||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Med | 32 | 38.79% | 2.0789 | 28.38 | 11A 4C 2D 1M | +72.84% | -32.95% | - | ||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Med | 35 | 28.58% | 1.5318 | 41.78 | 14A 4C 2D 2M | +157.42% | -26.44% | - | ||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Med | 33 | 34.77% | 2.6295 | 12.55 | 6A 4C 1D 1M | +63.62% | -43.10% | |||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 33 | 39.36% | 2.4167 | 49.24 | 20A 9C 2D 1M | +96.33% | -22.73% | - | ||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Med | 34 | 26.08% | 1.6274 | 52.23 | 19A 10C 3M 1NS | +120.19% | -42.57% | - | ||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Low | 35 | 26.81% | 1.3274 | 29.38 | 8A 3C 1M | +142.41% | -35.00% | |||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 34 | 19.62% | 1.0332 | 45.49 | 14A 1C 4D 2M 1NS | +146.96% | -51.55% | - | ||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Med | 35 | 25.20% | 1.7601 | 27.84 | 13A 8C 3M 1NS | +62.05% | -59.17% | - | ||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 27 | 52.27% | 3.3503 | 29.55 | 17A 4C 2D | +83.88% | -3.88% | - | ||
Stage 21 Stage 21 Med | 35 | 39.21% | 2.4401 | 22.95 | 10A 2C | +146.24% | -3.45% | - | ||
Stage 22 Stage 22 Med | 29 | 45.94% | 3.4818 | 26.71 | 18A 4C 1D 1M | +77.59% | -18.42% | - | ||
Stage 23 Stage 23 Med | 35 | 34.51% | 2.4892 | 32.54 | 15A 4C 4D 1M | +98.90% | -31.36% | - | ||
Stage 24 Stage 24 Med | 30 | 46.34% | 2.4479 | 22.06 | 10A 1C 1D | +100.91% | -6.90% | - | ||
Stage 25 Stage 25 Med | 30 | 47.56% | 3.8682 | 26.11 | 20A 7C 1M 1NS | +56.16% | -25.74% | |||
Stage 26 Stage 26 Med | 28 | 48.84% | 3.2446 | 15.41 | 7A 5C | +82.80% | -10.71% | - | ||
Stage 27 Stage 27 Med | 35 | 26.37% | 1.3582 | 29.45 | 7A 5C 1NS | +152.79% | -33.33% | - | ||
Stage 28 Stage 28 Med | 25 | 56.66% | 3.4199 | 15.79 | 10A 1C 1D | +58.85% | -10.00% | |||
Stage 29 Stage 29 Med | 34 | 36.21% | 2.2161 | 25.27 | 10A 2C | +176.17% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 30 Stage 30 Med | 20 | 56.23% | 3.2723 | 15.28 | 7A 5C | +48.21% | -16.67% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.