Match Performance
Your Performance
49.43% of winner
Place:32 / 35
Match %:49.43%
Match Pts:1285.79
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:46.42%
Std Dev:9.4
Spread:49.4 pts
Hits:388A 129C 24D 13M 2NS
Best:
78.16% (S24)
Worst:
28.78% (S13)
Division Winner
Robert Cernigoj
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2601.13
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:93.90%
Std Dev:8.1
Spread:28.4 pts
Hits:463A 78C 8D 5M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
71.64% (S6)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 1.7× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
46.67%
28 stages · 28.78% – 78.16%
Low HF(Technical)
40.83%
2 stages · 34.10% – 47.55%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
46.60%
15 stages · 32.80% – 78.16%
Medium(13-24 shots)
43.49%
10 stages · 28.78% – 54.97%
Long(25+ shots)
50.30%
5 stages · 42.25% – 56.34%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 29 | 53.74% | 4.3282 | 22.18 | 15A 7C | +65.40% | -11.11% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 29 | 52.42% | 2.8571 | 45.50 | 21A 7C 4D | +65.33% | -13.33% | |||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 28 | 58.96% | 3.8334 | 15.13 | 11A 1C | +69.62% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 32 | 48.34% | 2.7537 | 46.12 | 23A 7C 1D 1M | +79.95% | -13.01% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 32 | 47.05% | 2.5227 | 34.09 | 15A 3C 2D | +98.66% | -6.52% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Low | 35 | 34.10% | 1.6793 | 18.46 | 4A 7C 1M | +62.36% | -44.64% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Med | 33 | 42.55% | 2.5557 | 15.26 | 9A 1C 1D 1M | +52.75% | -35.00% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 35 | 35.49% | 2.8094 | 13.17 | 8A 2C 1D 1M | +73.75% | -38.33% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 30 | 49.83% | 3.3453 | 16.74 | 10A 2C | +93.75% | -3.45% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 35 | 37.17% | 3.0769 | 20.80 | 15A 3C 2M | +75.68% | -34.69% | |||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Med | 35 | 32.80% | 2.4625 | 16.65 | 9A 2C 1M | +123.19% | -26.79% | - | ||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Med | 28 | 49.83% | 2.6703 | 29.21 | 12A 6C | +77.89% | -11.36% | - | ||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Med | 34 | 28.78% | 1.5428 | 35.65 | 14A 5C 3M | +119.65% | -36.78% | - | ||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Med | 32 | 36.73% | 2.7778 | 12.60 | 7A 3C 1D 1M | +64.28% | -39.66% | - | ||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 28 | 56.34% | 3.4595 | 39.89 | 23A 7C 2D | +59.05% | -10.39% | - | ||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Med | 32 | 42.25% | 2.6364 | 43.62 | 23A 6C 2D 1M 1NS | +83.90% | -22.30% | - | ||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Low | 30 | 47.55% | 2.3540 | 22.94 | 9A 3C | +89.27% | -10.00% | - | ||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 28 | 41.66% | 2.1939 | 42.39 | 16A 4C 1D | +130.13% | -4.12% | - | ||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Med | 31 | 45.81% | 3.1995 | 30.63 | 15A 7C 2D | +78.29% | -18.33% | - | ||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 30 | 47.70% | 3.0576 | 27.80 | 14A 8C 1D 1NS | +72.99% | -17.48% | - | ||
Stage 21 Stage 21 Med | 23 | 59.23% | 3.6860 | 14.65 | 9A 3C | +57.19% | -6.90% | - | ||
Stage 22 Stage 22 Med | 35 | 28.93% | 2.1926 | 36.03 | 14A 5C 4D 1M | +139.56% | -30.70% | - | ||
Stage 23 Stage 23 Med | 27 | 54.97% | 3.9648 | 27.24 | 19A 4C 1D | +66.50% | -8.47% | - | ||
Stage 24 Stage 24 Med | 9 | 78.16% | 4.1288 | 12.11 | 7A 5C | +10.29% | -13.79% | - | ||
Stage 25 Stage 25 Med | 28 | 52.39% | 4.2612 | 29.10 | 21A 6C 1D | +74.04% | -8.82% | |||
Stage 26 Stage 26 Med | 30 | 46.29% | 3.0751 | 16.91 | 8A 4C | +100.59% | -7.14% | - | ||
Stage 27 Stage 27 Med | 29 | 48.72% | 2.5093 | 21.52 | 9A 3C | +84.72% | -10.00% | - | ||
Stage 28 Stage 28 Med | 33 | 46.15% | 2.7855 | 17.95 | 7A 5C | +80.58% | -16.67% | |||
Stage 29 Stage 29 Med | 32 | 43.00% | 2.6316 | 22.04 | 11A 1C | +140.87% | +3.57% | - | ||
Stage 30 Stage 30 Med | 30 | 39.40% | 2.2932 | 24.42 | 10A 2C | +136.86% | -6.67% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.