Marcel van den Berg

Extreme Euro Open 2025Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
41.79% of winner
Place:35 / 35
Match %:41.79%
Match Pts:1086.96
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:39.24%
Std Dev:11.2
Spread:42.3 pts
Hits:410A 105C 14D 25M 14NS 2P
Best:
59.76% (S3)
Worst:
17.46% (S24)
Division Winner
Robert Cernigoj
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2601.13
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:93.90%
Std Dev:8.1
Spread:28.4 pts
Hits:463A 78C 8D 5M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
71.64% (S6)
10%
55%
100%
You Winner Avg

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
39.22%
28 stages · 17.46% – 59.76%
Low HF(Technical)
39.68%
2 stages · 36.48% – 42.89%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
41.94%
15 stages · 17.46% – 59.76%
Medium(13-24 shots)
40.23%
10 stages · 18.17% – 54.57%
Long(25+ shots)
34.75%
5 stages · 25.42% – 47.16%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
3520.78%1.673623.9012A 6C 2D 2M 2NS
+78.23%
-62.96%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
3528.72%1.565246.0024A 4C 4M
2P
+67.15%
-52.00%
-
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
2659.76%3.886015.4412A
+73.09%
+3.45%
-
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
3347.16%2.686448.0224A 6C 1D 1M
+87.36%
-11.64%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
3518.17%0.974135.9317A 3M 2NS
+109.38%
-61.96%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Low
3242.89%2.112722.727A 4C 1D
+99.82%
-14.29%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Med
2852.58%3.157917.109A 3C
+71.17%
-10.00%
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
3339.97%3.164113.5910A 1C 1M
+79.29%
-28.33%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
2853.82%3.612915.5010A 2C
+79.40%
-3.45%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
3152.68%4.360221.1016A 4C
+78.21%
-6.12%
Stage 11
Stage 11
Med
2951.72%3.882113.919A 3C
+86.46%
-3.57%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
2948.11%2.578530.2513A 4C 1D
+84.23%
-11.36%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
2654.57%2.925032.8215A 7C
+102.22%
+10.34%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Med
3428.81%2.178215.157A 2C 2D 1M
+97.52%
-43.10%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
3534.52%2.119941.0421A 7C 1D 3M 1NS
+63.64%
-43.51%
-
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
3525.42%1.585852.3423A 6C 3M 2NS
+120.66%
-43.92%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Low
3236.48%1.806023.8110A 1C 1M
+96.45%
-28.33%
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
2940.71%2.143831.7215A 4C 1D 1M 1NS
+72.20%
-29.90%
-
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
2850.80%3.548030.4419A 4C 1D
+77.18%
-10.00%
-
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
3527.47%1.760736.3515A 6C 1D 1M 2NS
+126.20%
-37.86%
-
Stage 21
Stage 21
Med
3148.25%3.002718.6510A 2C
+100.11%
-3.45%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Med
3045.36%3.438030.2516A 8C
+101.13%
-8.77%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
3443.15%3.112031.1719A 4C 1M
+90.53%
-17.80%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
3517.46%0.922133.626A 3C 2D 1M
+206.19%
-46.55%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
3438.37%3.120930.4422A 5C 1M 2NS
+82.06%
-30.15%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
3533.43%2.220714.866A 4C 1D 1M
+76.28%
-41.07%
-
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
3428.88%1.487325.5511A 1C 2NS
+119.31%
-36.67%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
3540.49%2.444322.9110A 2C
+130.48%
-6.67%
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
3145.78%2.801920.7011A 1C
+126.23%
+3.57%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
2248.71%2.834820.4611A 1C
+98.45%
-3.33%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.