Match Performance
Your Performance
54.41% of winner
Place:30 / 35
Match %:54.41%
Match Pts:1415.22
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:51.09%
Std Dev:11.5
Spread:50.0 pts
Hits:402A 110C 22D 20M
Best:
72.55% (S10)
Worst:
22.51% (S18)
Division Winner
Robert Cernigoj
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2601.13
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:93.90%
Std Dev:8.1
Spread:28.4 pts
Hits:463A 78C 8D 5M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
71.64% (S6)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 1.8× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
51.51%
28 stages · 22.51% – 72.55%
Low HF(Technical)
41.77%
2 stages · 31.88% – 51.65%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
50.73%
15 stages · 28.58% – 64.53%
Medium(13-24 shots)
53.01%
10 stages · 22.51% – 72.55%
Long(25+ shots)
48.82%
5 stages · 34.68% – 59.11%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 17 | 68.45% | 5.5127 | 18.14 | 18A 3C 1D | +35.27% | -7.41% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 34 | 34.68% | 1.8905 | 41.26 | 18A 9C 1D 4M | +49.93% | -48.00% | |||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 29 | 57.54% | 3.7412 | 12.83 | 8A 2C 2D | +43.83% | -17.24% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 34 | 41.88% | 2.3856 | 41.08 | 15A 14C 1D 2M | +60.28% | -32.88% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 26 | 62.51% | 3.3513 | 24.17 | 17A 2C 1M | +40.85% | -11.96% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Low | 31 | 51.65% | 2.5437 | 18.87 | 8A 2C 2D | +65.96% | -14.29% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Med | 22 | 64.53% | 3.8760 | 12.90 | 8A 3C 1D | +29.13% | -16.67% | |||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 31 | 43.12% | 3.4134 | 15.82 | 9A 3C | +108.71% | -10.00% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 24 | 57.85% | 3.8835 | 13.39 | 9A 2C 1D | +54.98% | -10.34% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 18 | 72.55% | 6.0052 | 15.32 | 17A 2C 1D | +29.39% | -6.12% | |||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Med | 30 | 48.65% | 3.6517 | 14.24 | 8A 4C | +90.88% | -7.14% | - | ||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Med | 21 | 65.97% | 3.5356 | 24.89 | 17A 1C | +51.58% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Med | 31 | 47.93% | 2.5694 | 29.19 | 13A 6C 2D 1M | +79.85% | -13.79% | |||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Med | 27 | 53.01% | 4.0086 | 13.97 | 10A 2C | +82.14% | -3.45% | |||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 25 | 59.11% | 3.6299 | 39.12 | 24A 7C 1D | +55.98% | -7.79% | - | ||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Med | 26 | 51.99% | 3.2437 | 43.16 | 22A 10C | +81.96% | -5.41% | - | ||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Low | 34 | 31.88% | 1.5784 | 17.74 | 9A 1C 2M | +46.37% | -53.33% | - | ||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 33 | 22.51% | 1.1851 | 31.22 | 14A 2C 1D 4M | +69.49% | -61.86% | - | ||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Med | 30 | 48.63% | 3.3969 | 26.20 | 16A 6C 1D 1M | +52.50% | -25.83% | - | ||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 31 | 45.89% | 2.9412 | 29.24 | 17A 3C 2D 1M | +81.95% | -16.50% | - | ||
Stage 21 Stage 21 Med | 24 | 57.81% | 3.5976 | 15.01 | 10A 1C 1D | +61.05% | -6.90% | - | ||
Stage 22 Stage 22 Med | 27 | 47.38% | 3.5910 | 23.67 | 15A 6C 2D 1M | +57.38% | -25.44% | - | ||
Stage 23 Stage 23 Med | 30 | 53.13% | 3.8324 | 30.79 | 23A 1C | +88.20% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 24 Stage 24 Med | 34 | 28.58% | 1.5094 | 18.55 | 9A 1C 2M | +68.94% | -51.72% | - | ||
Stage 25 Stage 25 Med | 25 | 57.55% | 4.6812 | 24.78 | 17A 10C 1D | +48.21% | -14.71% | - | ||
Stage 26 Stage 26 Med | 23 | 58.99% | 3.9187 | 13.78 | 9A 3C | +63.46% | -3.57% | - | ||
Stage 27 Stage 27 Med | 27 | 51.51% | 2.6528 | 21.11 | 10A 2C | +81.20% | -6.67% | - | ||
Stage 28 Stage 28 Med | 28 | 55.02% | 3.3210 | 13.55 | 11A 1M | +36.32% | -25.00% | |||
Stage 29 Stage 29 Med | 24 | 59.80% | 3.6601 | 15.30 | 10A 2C | +67.21% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 30 Stage 30 Med | 29 | 41.00% | 2.3860 | 23.47 | 11A 1D | +127.64% | -6.67% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.