Match Performance
Your Performance
53.23% of winner
Place:31 / 35
Match %:53.23%
Match Pts:1384.57
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:49.99%
Std Dev:9.3
Spread:48.7 pts
Hits:397A 122C 17D 18M 3NS
Best:
76.70% (S3)
Worst:
27.99% (S14)
Division Winner
Robert Cernigoj
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2601.13
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:93.90%
Std Dev:8.1
Spread:28.4 pts
Hits:463A 78C 8D 5M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
71.64% (S6)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 1.7× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
49.78%
28 stages · 27.99% – 76.70%
Low HF(Technical)
54.60%
2 stages · 41.69% – 67.51%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
53.35%
15 stages · 27.99% – 76.70%
Medium(13-24 shots)
46.98%
10 stages · 36.68% – 58.21%
Long(25+ shots)
50.30%
5 stages · 42.22% – 66.44%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 33 | 40.85% | 3.2898 | 17.63 | 11A 7C 2D 2M | +31.47% | -46.30% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 24 | 66.44% | 3.6213 | 35.07 | 23A 7C 1D 1M | +27.43% | -15.33% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 11 | 76.70% | 4.9875 | 12.03 | 12A | +34.87% | +3.45% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 31 | 50.57% | 2.8808 | 39.92 | 18A 11C 2D 1M | +55.75% | -21.23% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 33 | 39.92% | 2.1403 | 36.91 | 16A 3C 1M | +115.09% | -14.13% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Low | 20 | 67.51% | 3.3248 | 15.64 | 9A 2C 1D | +37.55% | -7.14% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Med | 27 | 53.71% | 3.2258 | 11.47 | 9A 2D 1M | +14.81% | -38.33% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 23 | 56.92% | 4.5052 | 12.43 | 10A 2C | +63.98% | -6.67% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 25 | 57.56% | 3.8641 | 15.01 | 11A 1C | +73.73% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 28 | 58.21% | 4.8180 | 18.68 | 15A 5C | +57.77% | -8.16% | - | ||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Med | 27 | 55.46% | 4.1636 | 13.45 | 10A 2C | +80.29% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Med | 26 | 53.40% | 2.8620 | 23.76 | 9A 7C 2D | +44.70% | -22.73% | - | ||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Med | 32 | 43.02% | 2.3061 | 33.39 | 13A 7C 1D 1M | +105.73% | -11.49% | - | ||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Med | 35 | 27.99% | 2.1167 | 15.59 | 5A 6C 1M | +103.26% | -43.10% | - | ||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 32 | 44.32% | 2.7212 | 45.20 | 22A 7C 2D 1M | +80.22% | -20.13% | - | ||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Med | 29 | 46.94% | 2.9289 | 38.24 | 21A 9C 2M | +61.21% | -24.32% | |||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Low | 31 | 41.69% | 2.0637 | 22.29 | 10A 2C 1NS | +83.91% | -23.33% | - | ||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 25 | 50.42% | 2.6551 | 35.78 | 16A 5C | +94.25% | -2.06% | - | ||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Med | 33 | 36.68% | 2.5618 | 22.25 | 18A 2C 1D 3M 1NS | +29.51% | -52.50% | - | ||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 29 | 48.27% | 3.0937 | 33.94 | 18A 5C | +111.20% | +1.94% | - | ||
Stage 21 Stage 21 Med | 20 | 60.18% | 3.7448 | 14.42 | 10A 1C 1D | +54.72% | -6.90% | - | ||
Stage 22 Stage 22 Med | 31 | 44.65% | 3.3841 | 23.64 | 17A 5C 2M | +57.18% | -29.82% | |||
Stage 23 Stage 23 Med | 25 | 56.31% | 4.0613 | 26.10 | 18A 5C 1D | +59.54% | -10.17% | - | ||
Stage 24 Stage 24 Med | 29 | 51.84% | 2.7383 | 19.72 | 9A 3C | +79.60% | -6.90% | - | ||
Stage 25 Stage 25 Med | 33 | 42.22% | 3.4342 | 24.46 | 14A 11C 1D 2M | +46.29% | -38.24% | - | ||
Stage 26 Stage 26 Med | 26 | 54.12% | 3.5952 | 15.02 | 9A 3C | +78.17% | -3.57% | - | ||
Stage 27 Stage 27 Med | 28 | 50.22% | 2.5862 | 23.20 | 12A | +99.14% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 28 Stage 28 Med | 31 | 52.36% | 3.1603 | 17.72 | 10A 2C | +78.27% | -6.67% | - | ||
Stage 29 Stage 29 Med | 26 | 55.45% | 3.3938 | 17.09 | 11A 1C | +86.78% | +3.57% | - | ||
Stage 30 Stage 30 Med | 31 | 38.60% | 2.2461 | 21.37 | 11A 1C 1NS | +107.27% | -20.00% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.